What's the hold up with my photography portfolio?
I've had quite a lot of people contact me asking where my photography portfolio was. I've been posting lots about my new gear, and new found websites, but no proof that I'm actually doing something.
So here's the response to all of you:
With school and work keeping me busy, I've barely had time to go through all my photo shoots and send the clients their proofs.
But to be completely honest, I have a portfolio, I have about 4 different proof of concepts ready to go… but I'm not happy with any of them. I'll start working on one idea, get about 50% through creating it, and when I wake up the next day, I'll find a ton of things wrong with it. Colour, style, layout… you name it.
So, it's not that I have writers block… I have a lot of ideas, but I just can’t seem to settle on one that I’m happy with. Maybe my problem is that I'm putting too much emphasis on the presentation, rather than the content, but then again, this is a photography portfolio, and I'd like to display my creativity with both.
I'm sure a lot of you have done the same thing for your blogs and websites… so please chime in with your advice on how settle on a design and like it the next day.



simple is perfect
if the sole focus of your site is to showcase photography work then putting that into a fancy shell or crazy experience can take that focus away. meaning your photography isn't the thing being showcased. the way most sites for photographers go is simple flash sites based around a slide show, click to next picture, deal. these will have some sort of semi fancy, but not overly dramatic transition between pieces. some that come to mind are
http://www.ariil.com/
http://www.erikrefner.com/
http://www.peters-photography.de/
http://www.rustyralston.com/
http://www.troytcoburn.com/
sometimes though even flickr is just the way to go [ http://flickr.com/photos/wowzzaa/ ]
so ya. photography sites = super duper simple so that the photos have the loudest voice
I can sympathize with you :)
Post new comment